Once Luminar's Digital Asset Manager (DAM) ships, things will change. * The image is a prototype A new direction That's compared to the 30% of the time they spend editing images. More than 70% of the time, the typical user of a DAM will spend time browsing and looking at, rating, promoting, and rejecting images. That alone brings speed, and plenty of it. That's the kind of direction we want to take at Skylum. Compare that to the old-fashioned, TV remote with 60 or more buttons. Have you ever seen an Apple TV remote? It has three buttons on it. We also want to make sure that with Luminar, it will be fast, fun and easy to browse, rate, edit, share, and enjoy your pictures. We're focusing our research and engineering efforts on a few key things. Skylum plans to build our DAM so that we can keep simple things simple. The team at Skylum knows that and is building future versions of Luminar with that in mind. There's no need for lots of features you won't or don't use. You want to see your photo (front-and-center), and the only other things on your screen should be the things that solve specific problems. If that's the case, then we need to rethink the interface. If you think about it, you DO spend more time looking at, rating, cataloging, your images than you do editing them. Your photos are your reason for using a post-processing program. Instead, Skylum is rethinking everything to create something new. Skylum is not trying to replicate the tools or even the approach used by companies like Adobe. If photographers will simply zero out their thinking on post-processing, and open their minds to doing it a different way, they’ll have all sorts of new opportunities.Īs Skylum works on building the world's fastest Digital Asset Manager (DAM) for Luminar, the company is not merely copying the actions of other software makers. You do the things you want to do and that's good enough. Think about it, your current workflow is probably your current workflow because it's comfortable. It doesn't matter if Skylum's next version has this tool or that tool because the company is aiming to reinvent the way photographers do things. More importantly, it helps me make great photographs, differently. And I know how those programs work.īut I switched to Luminar more than a year and a half ago because for me, it works better, faster and easier, and it focuses on the tasks I need to get done, not the tools. In the past, I have used Aperture, Lightroom, and Photoshop as significant parts of my own personal photography workflow. These photographers are just reacting to current products. When photographers learn that Skylum is introducing new versions of the award-winning, photo editing software Luminar, they usually start spewing a laundry list of "must-haves" for the next version. Looking at some of the currently available solutions, it's clear to me and the team at Skylum, that we need to start over. Photographers spend more time looking at, rating, and cataloging their images than they do editing them.Photographers usually use only a fraction of their post-processing software's features but they still like a full-featured product.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |